Smart Mobility and Elderly People. Can ICT Make the City More Accessible for Everybody?

  • Rosaria Battarra National Research Council Institute of Studies on Mediterranean Societies Naples
  • Floriana Zucaro Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (Dicea), University of Napoli Federico II
  • Maria Rosa Tremiterra Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (Dicea), University of Napoli Federico II
Keywords: Elderly, Smart Mobility, Italian Cities


The ageing population is a phenomenon whose relevance grows over time and quickly spreads in different territorial contexts. Therefore, cities will have to take into account the ageing population and define policies and strategies to improve the quality of life. For this purpose is particularly remarkable the transport sector because it allows to use the urban services and to promote an active ageing. Within the field of urban studies aimed at facing the new challenges related to social developments, including that of the ageing population, the Smart City paradigm has been spread to make cities safe, accessible and sustainable. The strategies to improve accessibility and safety of the mobility system using ICTs can have positive impacts in terms of ensuring elderly people the ability to lead an autonomous life and participate actively in society according to one’s individual needs. In this framework, the aim of the paper is to analyse how Italian cities are declining the topic of Smart Mobility, with particular attention to the use of new technologies to improve the elderly trips. The paper attempt to show that in the sample of Italian cities analysed the ICTs applied to the transport sector do not fully realize their potential; this is not due to the limited fields of application, but rather to the lack of a “system-orientated” perspective when applying innovations. The adoption of a smart approach cannot be limited to a market-induced uncritical introduction of devices or sensors, instead, it will be necessary to refine the tools for understanding the needs of specific categories of users, such as the elderly, to define integrated strategies able to operate on many aspects simultaneously.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rosaria Battarra, National Research Council Institute of Studies on Mediterranean Societies Naples

Researcher of the National Research Council (Institute of Studies on the Mediterranean Systems in Naples). Since 1989 she has been cooperating with the “Dipartimento di Pianificazione e Scienza del Territorio” of the University of Naples Federico II, carring-out research into urban redevelopment and especially on the tools and procedures for the implementation of the plans.

Floriana Zucaro, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (Dicea), University of Napoli Federico II
Engineer, she received a M.Sc. in Environmental and Territorial Engineering at the University of Naples Federico II with a specialization in management of urban and territorial transformations. In April 2015 she holds a PhD in Hydraulic, Transport and Territorial Systems Engineering at the Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering – University of Naples Federico II. Since 2014 she has been a scholarship holder within the Project Smart Energy Master for the energy management of territory financed by PON 04A2_00120 R&C Axis II, from 2012 to 2015. Her research activity is focused on the integration of land use planning and energy saving policies in urban contests.
Maria Rosa Tremiterra, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (Dicea), University of Napoli Federico II
Engineer, Ph.D. student in Civil Systems Engineering at University of Naples Federico II. She received a master’s degree in Architecture and Building Engineering with a thesis in urban planning. In 2014, she won a one-year grant for post-lauream education and research within the Project Smart Energy Master at the Department of Civil Engineering, Building and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II.


Abou‐Raya, S., & ElMeguid, L. A. (2009). Road traffic accidents and the elderly. Geriatrics & gerontology international, 9(3), 290-297. doi:

Aguiar, B. & Macário, R. (2017). The need for an Elderly centred mobility policy. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4355-4369. doi:

Albino, V., Berardi, U. & Dangelico, R.M. (2015). Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. doi:

Banister, D., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transport policy, 11(2), 105-115. doi:

Banister, D. (2014). Innovation in mobility: combining vision, technology and behavioural change. In J.Y. Grosclaude, R.K. Pachauri & L. Tubiana (Eds.), A Planet for Life – Innovation and Sustainable Development. Delhi, IN: TERI.

Battarra, R., Lombardi, C., & Raimondo, M. (2015). Smart City and Metropolitan Area. The Energy Component in the Case Studies of Genoa and Naples. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8(2), 143-158. doi:

Battarra, R., Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F., & Tremiterra, M.R. (2018). Smart Mobility in Italian Metropolitan Cities: A comparative analysis through indicators and actions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 556-567. doi:

Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518.

Benevolo, C., Dameri, R.P., & D’Auria, B. (2016). Smart Mobility in Smart City. Action Taxonomy, ICT Intensity and Public Benefits. In T. Torre, A. M. Braccini & R. Spinelli (Eds.), Empowering Organizations. Cham, CH: Springer International Publishing. doi:

Bobillier Chaumon, M. E., Michel, C., Tarpin Bernard, F., & Croisile, B. (2014). Can ICT improve the quality of life of elderly adults living in residential home care units? From actual impacts to hidden artefacts. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(6), 574-590. doi:

Boscacci, F., Maltese, I., & Mariotti, I. (2014). Smartness and Italian cities. Smartness and Italian cities. A cluster analysis. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility And Environment, Special Issue INPUT 2014, 141-152. doi:

Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82.

Carlo, S. (2014). Giovani anziani e ICT: tra rischi di isolamento e opportunità di invecchiamento attivo. Sociologia e politiche sociali, 20(3), 89-108. doi:

Caves, R. W., & Walshok, M. G. (1999). Adopting innovations in information technology: the California municipal experience. Cities, 16(1), 3-12. doi:

Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R., & Vaupel, J. W. (2009). Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. The lancet, 374(9696), 1196-1208. doi:

Engels, B., & Liu, G. J. (2011). Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 984-996. doi:

Eurostat. (2016). Population structure and ageing. Retrieved September 21, 2018 from

FPA (2017). ICity Rate 2017. Retrieved September 21, 2018 from:

Geurs, K. T., & Ritsema van Eck, J. R. (2001). Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact (report no. 408505006). Utrecht , NL: Utrecht University, Urban Research Center. Retrieved from

Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Vienna, AU: Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved from:

Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological Mobilities and the urban conditions. London, UK: Routledge.

ISTAT. (2017). Il futuro demografico del Paese. Previsioni regionali della popolazione residente al 2065. Retrieved from:

Joumard R., Gudmundsson, H., Kehagia, F., Mancebo Quintana, S., Boulter, P., Flokeson, L., McCrae, I., Boughedaoui, M., Waeger, P., & Calderon, E. (2010). Transport, environment and sustainability. In R. Joumard and H. Gudmundsson (Eds.), Indicators of environmental sustainability in transport: An interdisciplinary approach to methods. Bron: European Commission. Retrieved from

Kim, S., & Ulfarsson, G. (2004). Travel mode choice of the elderly: effects of personal, household, neighborhood, and trip characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1894), 117-126. doi:

Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent Cities. Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. London, UK: Spon Press.

Komninos, N., Tsarchopoulos, P. & Kakderi, C. (2014). New services design for smart cities: a planning roadmap for user-driven innovation. WiMobCity '14 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international workshop on Wireless and mobile technologies for smart cities, 29-38. doi:

Lam, D., & Head, P., (2012). Sustainable urban mobility. In O. Inderwildi & D. King (Eds.), Energy, Transport, & the Environment (pp. 359-371). London, UK: Springer. doi:

Lättman, K., Olsson, L.E., & Friman, M. (2018). A new approach to accessibility – Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel. Research in Transportation Economics. In press. doi:

Lee, C., Park, S., Jung, Y., Lee, Y., & Mathews, M. (2018). Internet of Things: Technology to Enable the Elderly. 2018 Second IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC), Laguna Hills, CA, US, 358-362. doi:

Lyons, G. (2016). Getting smart about urban mobility–aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 115, 4-14. doi:

Mahizhnan, A. (1999). Smart cities: the Singapore case. Cities, 16(1), 13-18. doi:

Manville, C., Cochrane, G., Cave, J., Millard, J., Pederson, J. K., Thaarup, R. K., … , & Kotterink, B. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Bruxelles, BE: European Parliament, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. doi:

Mordini, E., Wright, D., Wadhwa, K., De Hert, P., Mantovani, E., Thestrup, J., Van Steendam, G., D’Amico, A., & Vater, I. (2009). Senior citizens and the ethics of e-inclusion. Ethics and Information Technology, 11, 203–220. doi:

Mosannenzadeh, F., & Vettorato, D. (2014). Defining Smart City. A Conceptual Framework Based on Keyword Analysis. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility And Environment, Special Issue INPUT 2014, 683-694. doi:

Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708-726. doi:

Noy, K., & Givoni, M. (2018). Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 10(2), 422. doi:

Papa, E., & Lauwers, D. (2015). Smart Mobility: Opportunity or Threat to Innovate Places and Cities. In: 20th International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional Development in the Information Society, Proceedings. Retrieved from

Papa, R., Gargiulo, C., Franco, S., & Russo, L. (2014). Urban Smartness Vs Urban Competitiveness: A Comparison of Italian Cities Rankings. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility And Environment, Special Issue INPUT 2014, 771-782. doi:

Papa, R., Gargiulo, C., & Battarra, R. (2016). Città Metropolitane e Smart Governance: Iniziative di successo e nodi critici verso la Smart City . Naples, IT: FedOA-Federico II University Press. doi:10.6093/978-88-6887-005-8

Papa R., Gargiulo C., Cristiano M, Di Francesco I., & Tulisi, A. (2015). Less smart more city. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8(2), 159-182. doi:10.6092/1970-9870/3012

Santana, P. (2017). Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra, PT: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra/Coimbra University Press. doi:

Santinha G., & de Castro E. A. (2010). Creating More Intelligent Cities: The Role of ICT in Promoting Territorial Governance. Journal of Urban Technology, 17(2), 77-98. doi:

Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In J. Domingue, A. Alex Galis, A. Avras, T. Zahariadis & D. Lambert (Eds.), The future internet: future internet assembly 2011: achievements and technological promises (pp. 431-446). Berlin, DE: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-20897-3

Schmöcker, J. D., Quddus, M. A., Noland, R. B., & Bell, M. G. (2008). Mode choice of older and disabled people: a case study of shopping trips in London. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(4), 257-267. doi:

Solá, A. G., Vilhelmson, B., & Larsson, A. (2018). Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension. Journal of Transport Geography, 70, 1-10. doi:

Staricco, L. (2013). Smart Mobility, opportunità e condizioni. TeMA. Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment, 6(3), 341-354. doi:

Titheridge, H., Achuthan, K., Mackett, R., & Solomon, J. (2009). Assessing the extent of transport social exclusion among the elderly. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2(2), 31-48. doi:

Tournier, I., Dommes, A., & Cavallo, V. (2016). Review of safety and mobility issues among older pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 91, 24-35. doi:

United Nations (UN). (2001). World Population Ageing: 1950-2050. New York, USA: United Nations Publications. Retrieved from:

van Nunen, J., Huijbregts, P., & Rietveld, P. (2011). Introduction to transitions towards sustainable mobility. In J. van Nunen, P. Huijbregts & P. Rietveld (Eds.). Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility (pp. 1-15). Berlin Heidelberg, D: Springer-Verlag. doi:

Guo, A. W., Brake, J. F., Edwards, S. J., Blythe, P. T., & Fairchild, R. G. (2010). The application of in-vehicle systems for elderly drivers. European Transport Research Review, 2(3), 165-174. doi:

Wilkowska, W., Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2018). Rethinking technology development for older adults: A responsible research and innovation duty. In R. Pak & A. McLaughlin (Eds.), Aging, Technology and Health (pp. 1-30). Academic Press. doi:

World Health Organization (WHO). (2007). Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Paris, F: WHO. Retrieved from

World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Global Health and Aging. Retrieved from

Yang, J., & Coughlin, J. F. (2014). In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 15(2), 333-340. doi:

Yigitcanlar, T., & Bulu, M. (2016). Urban Knowledge and Innovation Spaces. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 1-9. doi:

Zawieska, J., & Pieriegud, J. (2018). Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation. Transport Policy, 63, 39-50. doi:

How to Cite
Battarra, R., Zucaro, F., & Tremiterra, M. (2018). Smart Mobility and Elderly People. Can ICT Make the City More Accessible for Everybody?. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 23-42.
Special Issue 2018. SIET Elderly mobility